CASE 3; Performance appraisal
Continuing
our findings with HRM, we have quickly come to topic of Performance appraisal. Our
case start with real life horror story of employee which in the end turns into favor
of employee, in other words as title of blog says “A Performance AppraisalHorror Story (With A Happy Ending)”.
Hero of our
example, Jerry Bumgarner received his very first performance appraisal after
been seven years into HR-career. While in his own mind he had been nothing more
than excellent employee, when receiving negative feedback about his performance
it crushed him to the point he never wanted to receive appraisal feedback ever.
After feedback, he felt like he is total loser, and failure after years of
success. Receiving negative feedback was so upsetting, that he was considering
to leave his job and to move to work in another company. However, little he did
know, that purpose of performance appraisal is not to bring employee
emotionally down, but rather to point his/her weaknesses, that he/she haven’t
realized earlier to improve on to maximize his output of work assignments.
Thanks to HR director who knew he need to step up and layout a plan with
supervisor and employee about goals, expectations and compensations of
achievements. With this clear and well planned plan, employee was able to show
his supervisor best of his work, which results win-win situation to all three parties,
employer, employee and supervisor. (1)
So, what is
this so called “Performance Appraisal? According to businessdictionary.com,
definition of Performance appraisal is “process where manager examines and
evaluates an employee’s work behavior by comparing it with preset standards,
document findings and uses the results to provide valuable feedback to employee
what improvements are needed and why.” Also, another task of Performance
appraisal is to determine who needs what kind of training, and who will be
promoted, demoted, retained or in worst case scenario to be fired. (2)
Performance
appraisal includes (figure 7.1, Managing human resources, Gomez, Balking &
Cardy, 2016, 233);
Identification; which means managers must identify and
determine which areas of work should he/she be examining when measuring
performance. The appraisal system must focus on relative characteristics that
affects success of company, thus leaving out characteristic such as race, age
or sex.
Measurement; This is the key part of appraisal
system, where managers are reviewing results of employees based on their
performance and conclude how “good” or “bad” it was. To keep it fair
measurement and reviews must be consistent.
Management; Instead of taking into
consideration only past-oriented activities, Appraisal must take
future-oriented view of to encourage employees to achieve their potential in
the company. This means, employees must be provided feedback and necessary coaching
to achieve goals of not only employee but of company as well.
The uses of Performance Appraisal
As we know
already, performance appraisals are periodic assessments of employees, to provide
them feedback., and pointing out weaknesses, strengths and laying out necessary
plan to improve performance of employees. So shortly, performance appraisal is
to evaluate, develop, recognize and
feedback the employee. Performance appraisal start with evaluating how employees have meet the
goals and objectives set by their managers/supervisors, and if necessary by
pointing out how the can improve from this point. While evaluation is to
identify weaknesses, developing is
more of working with weaknesses turning them into strengths. This can be
achieved by providing employee necessary training session. For example, in
Managing Human Resources (chapter 7, Gomez, & al, 2016, 231), manager
George was having performance review with employee Estelle. As it was pointed
out that Estelle’s poor ratings on technical aspects, such as filing paperwork,
placing orders and keeping account information up-to-date. As she admits her
weaknesses, she doesn’t see it to be necessary for her to go for training as it
was suggested. Recognition is when
employee is outstanding an is constantly in top five percent in their group. As
a recognition, they might be assigned to management role and receive extra
bonus. Appraisals can be useful when collecting employee feedback about
their feelings towards employer and satisfaction of their career development.
Measuring
performance and tools
How to
measure employee’s performance then? It is not easy as it sounds. It is like
school grading where you grade students by numbers from one to five or labels
such as, excellent, good, average and poor. Grading need to be relevant on
topic, and sometimes only grading is not enough, but explanation is need to be
provided. Overall, no matter which grading system is used, it is difficult to
express dimensions of performance grading. Thank you for era of digitalization
that managers nowadays have various of appraisal formats from which to take
into practice and use on performance appraisal. Appraisal formats are divided
into two ways, by the type of judgement (relative or absolute) and by the focus
of the measure (trait, behavior, or outcome). (chapter 7, Gomez, & al,
2016, 236).
Relative judgment appraisal system compare all employees into
same ranking based on the job they are executing. Basically, it means comparing
employees with one to another. This provides ranking among fellow employees
from best to worst. However, this does not mean whoever is best, is best in actual
rating, only compared to his fellow coworkers. (figure 7.3, Managing human
resources, Gomez & al, 2016, 236)
In figure
7.3, there is three teams in compare, and each team member’s performance is
rated from best to worst, also there is rating of “actual performance” in left
graded from one to ten. In team 1, even though Marcos is evaluated as number
one in his group, he gets only overall grade of seven from perfect performance.
If we compare team 1 and team 2, we can see huge differences between number one
of team 1 and team 2, Marcos and Jill. Jill is graded as ten, where Marcos is
rated only for grade seven.
Absolute
judgement, counterpart of relative judgement appraisal, is asking supervisors judgement
on employee’s performance based on solely on performance standards. This means
employees are not compared with one another, but each one’s performance is individually
under review.
Conclusion
As we saw
in our example case, “A Performance Appraisal Horror Story (With A Happy
Ending)”, negative feedback is not always bad but, vice versa, in my opinion if
negative feedback is justified, the more it is important. Because usually as a
human being we are self-centered, and we do not often see our mistakes and
behavior. I have worked in few companies, as an employee and as an employer. I
have never received feedback, but I have been giving feedback to our employees.
All employees do not take negative feedback lightly, and might be crushing to
them in their little perfect world they have created for themselves in their
mind. I have learned a lot, how to gently give negative feedback, with first
providing good feedback, but also pointing out they have room for more
improvement, thus achieving unprecedented results. It is all out there within
their fingertips, out there for them to take it and make something of their
own. As I always tell my customers and coworkers, don’t focus too much on
positive feedback, because it might blind you, and don’t focus negatively in negative
feedback, as it will suffocate your ability to improve. Rather take the
feedback, work on it, punch it in the face, re-format it, and make it part of
your trait. It is like going in the gym, you will not get results only by going
once in a gym, but results are achieved overtime.
Sources;
Source
1:
Gomez, Balkin & Cardy, 2016. Managing Human
Resources, 8th edition, Pearson, chapter 7.
Source 2:
Bumgarner, 2011, A performance appraisal horror story (with
a happy ending),
accessed on
the 12.02.2017 & 25.02.2017
Source 3:
Business Dictionary,
Performance Appraisal,
Accessed on
the 12.02.2017 & 25.02.2017
Source 4:
Wikipedia,
Performance Appraisal,
Accessed on
the 12.02.2017 & 25.02.2017
Source 5:
Chron,
Small Business,
Accessed on
the 12.02.2017 & 25.02.2017





